2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2010 Alpina B3
To start off, 2010 Alpina B3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alpina B3 (355 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z22. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z22. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2010 Alpina B3.
Because 2010 Alpina B3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alpina B3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Alpina B3 (500 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2010 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2010 Alpina B3 | |
| Make | BMW | Alpina |
| Model | Z22 | B3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3000 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 355 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1560 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2730 mm |
