2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac STS. (302 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac STS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 187 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac STS (368 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac STS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z22 | STS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3600 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 302 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 368 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1802 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2957 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |
