2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2010 Holden Epica

To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP) has 180 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.

Because 2001 BMW Z22 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z22. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica. 2001 BMW Z22 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Epica has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Epica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z22 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2001 BMW Z22 2010 Holden Epica
Make BMW Holden
Model Z22 Epica
Year Released 2001 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3169 cc 1991 cc
Horse Power 328 HP 148 HP
Torque 350 Nm 320 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2700 mm