2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 485 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Because 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (318 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | Z22 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2781 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |
