2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (281 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2010 Saturn Outlook. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 330 kg more than 2010 Saturn Outlook. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saturn Outlook (361 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2010 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | BMW | Saturn |
Model | Z22 | Outlook |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 361 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 83 L |