2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (261 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2010 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | BMW | Suzuki |
| Model | Z22 | Equator |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3954 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |
