2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2012 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XJ (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z22. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z22. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 259 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XJ (515 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2012 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | Z22 | XJ |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5000 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1874 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3157 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 82 L |
