2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2013 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 (470 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z22. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z22. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 (601 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2013 Aston Martin DB9 | |
Make | BMW | Aston Martin |
Model | Z22 | DB9 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5900 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 601 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2745 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |