2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (314 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 338 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z22 | CTS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1953 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |