2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z22. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z22. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 1077 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z22 | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 6200 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 565 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2692 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 117 L |