2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z22. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z22. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 256 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | Z22 | XJ |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2995 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1871 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3032 mm |