2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z22. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z22. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 721 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | Z22 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 6400 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 459 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2336 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2916 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 93 L |
