2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2013 Kia Optima

To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2013 Kia Optima. (270 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia Optima. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 77 kg more than 2013 Kia Optima. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 BMW Z22 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z22. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia Optima (365 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.

Compare all specifications: