2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z22. (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z22. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 815 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | Z22 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5700 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 544 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2430 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 4180 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 100 L |