2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible vs. 1994 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible | 1994 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2460 mm |
