2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible vs. 2007 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (469 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible. (310 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac STS-V (595 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible. (410 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible | 2007 Cadillac STS-V | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z9 Gran Turismo Convertible | STS-V |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 4376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 469 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 595 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |
