2001 BMW Z9 vs. 1956 Chrysler C
To start off, 2001 BMW Z9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. At 5,801 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Chrysler C (350 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z9. (286 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Chrysler C should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Chrysler C weights approximately 265 kg more than 2001 BMW Z9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Chrysler C. (560 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Chrysler C.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z9 | 1956 Chrysler C | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | Z9 | C |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 5801 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 560 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3210 mm |
