2001 BMW Z9 vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2001 BMW Z9 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z9 (286 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z9 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z9 | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z9 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2580 mm |