2001 BMW Z9 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (328 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z9. (286 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 49 kg more than 2001 BMW Z9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Lumina. (465 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Lumina.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z9 | 2005 Chevrolet Lumina | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Z9 | Lumina |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 5800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 328 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 465 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1664 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |
