2001 BMW Z9 vs. 2008 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z9. (286 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z9 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2008 Cadillac STS.
Because 2008 Cadillac STS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac STS. (369 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z9 | 2008 Cadillac STS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z9 | STS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 597 Nm | 369 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |