2001 BMW Z9 vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z9 (286 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (172 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Because 2001 BMW Z9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet HHR. (226 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z9 | 2009 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Z9 | HHR |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |
