2001 BMW Z9 vs. 2010 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2010 GMC Yukon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Yukon (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z9. (286 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1077 kg more than 2001 BMW Z9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 GMC Yukon. (497 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 GMC Yukon.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z9 | 2010 GMC Yukon | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | Z9 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 286 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 597 Nm | 497 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2692 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 91 L |