2001 BMW Z9 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z9. (286 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z9 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z9 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z9 | ATS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 286 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 597 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2776 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |
