2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1948 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 472 kg more than 2001 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bristol Blenheim | 1948 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Blenheim | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 5674 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1870 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3210 mm |