2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1955 Buick 40
To start off, 2001 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 15 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bristol Blenheim | 1955 Buick 40 | |
Make | Bristol | Buick |
Model | Blenheim | 40 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 447 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1725 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3110 mm |