2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2001 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 510 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2001 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bristol Blenheim | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Bristol | Riley |
| Model | Blenheim | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 25 L |
