2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1982 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2001 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 212 kg more than 2001 Bristol Blenheim.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bristol Blenheim | 1982 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | Blenheim | Impala |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2960 mm |