2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1992 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2001 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Cadillac Seville would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 198 kg more than 2001 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2001 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bristol Blenheim | 1992 Cadillac Seville | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | Blenheim | Seville |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 4915 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1596 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 100 L |
