2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 1992 Rover Mini
To start off, 2001 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover Mini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover Mini would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 708 kg more than 1992 Rover Mini.
Because 2001 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1992 Rover Mini has manual transmission. 1992 Rover Mini will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bristol Blenheim | 1992 Rover Mini | |
Make | Bristol | Rover |
Model | Blenheim | Mini |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 34 L |