2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bristol Blenheim (350 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Blenheim should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 395 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Bristol Blenheim (500 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Bristol Blenheim will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: