2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 2 kg more than 2001 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2001 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bristol Blenheim | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Bristol | Volvo |
| Model | Blenheim | C70 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 68 L |
