2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 69 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bristol Blenheim | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Bristol | Mazda |
| Model | Blenheim | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3725 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 76 L |
