2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 137 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt.

Because 2001 Bristol Blenheim is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Bristol Blenheim. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt has manual transmission. 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Bristol Blenheim 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
Make Bristol Chevrolet
Model Blenheim Cobalt
Year Released 2001 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5900 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 260 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1398 kg 1261 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1120 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 105 L 49 L