2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Outback weights approximately 157 kg more than 2001 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2010 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2010 Subaru Outback has manual transmission. 2010 Subaru Outback will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bristol Blenheim | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Bristol | Subaru |
Model | Blenheim | Outback |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5900 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 70 L |