2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 559 kg more than 2001 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 2011 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bristol Blenheim | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Bristol | Jeep |
| Model | Blenheim | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1957 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4404 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 85 L |
