2001 Bristol Blenheim vs. 2013 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Blenheim would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lincoln MKS weights approximately 518 kg more than 2001 Bristol Blenheim.
Because 2013 Lincoln MKS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bristol Blenheim | 2013 Lincoln MKS | |
| Make | Bristol | Lincoln |
| Model | Blenheim | MKS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5900 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1916 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5222 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2172 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1565 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2868 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 105 L | 72 L |
