2001 Bristol Project Fighter vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (400 HP) has 296 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Project Fighter weights approximately 702 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bristol Project Fighter | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Bristol | Lotus |
| Model | Project Fighter | Elan |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7990 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 104 HP |
| Top Speed | 321 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2240 mm |
