2001 Bristol Project Fighter vs. 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (400 HP) has 277 more horse power than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter should accelerate faster than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (712 Nm) has 540 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste. (172 Nm). This means 2001 Bristol Project Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Bristol Project Fighter | 1978 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Bristol | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Project Fighter | Celeste |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7990 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 712 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2350 mm |
