2001 Bristol Project Fighter vs. 1999 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Project Fighter weights approximately 318 kg more than 1999 Dodge Dakota.
Because 1999 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (712 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Dodge Dakota. (468 Nm). This means 2001 Bristol Project Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Bristol Project Fighter | 1999 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Bristol | Dodge |
Model | Project Fighter | Dakota |
Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7990 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 712 Nm | 468 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1398 kg | 1080 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3330 mm |