2001 Bristol Project Fighter vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Project Fighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Project Fighter would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (400 HP) has 139 more horse power than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (261 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter should accelerate faster than 2010 Suzuki Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Bristol Project Fighter weights approximately 103 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Bristol Project Fighter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (712 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (381 Nm). This means 2001 Bristol Project Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Suzuki Equator. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 2001 Bristol Project Fighter has manual transmission. 2001 Bristol Project Fighter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: