2001 Bristol Project Fighter vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER

To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Bristol Project Fighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Bristol Project Fighter would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 2001 Bristol Project Fighter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (400 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. (367 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER weights approximately 454 kg more than 2001 Bristol Project Fighter.

Because 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Bristol Project Fighter (712 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. (542 Nm). This means 2001 Bristol Project Fighter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER has automatic transmission and 2001 Bristol Project Fighter has manual transmission. 2001 Bristol Project Fighter will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: