2001 Buick Regal vs. 1982 Renault 5
To start off, 2001 Buick Regal is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 5 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1982 Renault 5. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Buick Regal weights approximately 590 kg more than 1982 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Renault 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Renault 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Buick Regal (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 5. (221 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2001 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Buick Regal | 1982 Renault 5 | |
Make | Buick | Renault |
Model | Regal | 5 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 51 L |