2001 Buick Regal vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Buick Regal would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2001 Buick Regal. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2001 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 862 kg more than 2001 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Buick Regal. (311 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Buick Regal.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Buick Regal | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Regal | E-350 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 132 L |