2001 Cadillac Catera vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 2001 Cadillac Catera is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Cadillac Catera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac Catera (260 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac Catera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac Catera | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | Catera | 4000 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2962 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2550 mm |
