2001 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2001 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 220 kg more than 1963 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac Escalade | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | Escalade | Continental |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2620 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3210 mm |
