2001 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2001 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1510 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300.
Because 2001 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1972 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1972 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac Escalade | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | Escalade | 1300 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2430 mm |