2001 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2001 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1460 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2001 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Escalade | Sigma |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2520 mm |