2001 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 182 kg more than 2001 Cadillac Escalade.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac Escalade | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | Escalade | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 510 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2490 kg | 2672 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2878 mm |