2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL. (196 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Cadillac LMP | 1967 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | LMP | SL |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2306 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 401 Nm | 196 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2410 mm |
