2001 Cadillac LMP vs. 1968 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2001 Cadillac LMP is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Cadillac LMP is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Cadillac LMP (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1968 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Cadillac LMP should accelerate faster than 1968 NSU Ro 80.
Because 2001 Cadillac LMP is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Cadillac LMP. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Cadillac LMP (401 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm). This means 2001 Cadillac LMP will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Cadillac LMP | 1968 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Cadillac | NSU |
Model | LMP | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2390 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 401 Nm | 162 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2870 mm |